Share:
Europe is entering a major transformation in resilience thinking. Under the Critical Entities Resilience (CER) Directive, organizations are not only required to manage risks but also to understand, demonstrate, and maintain the elements that are “critical” to their operations, economy, and society.
4 Steps to Help Businesses and Infrastructure Prepare for the EU CER Directive
Europe is entering a major transformation in resilience thinking. Under the Critical Entities Resilience (CER) Directive, organizations are not only required to manage risks but also to understand, demonstrate, and maintain the elements that are “critical” to their operations, economy, and society.
In the past, resilience often meant protecting individual assets or recovering from isolated incidents. However, in today’s context — where climate risks, cyberattacks, and supply chain disruptions occur simultaneously — businesses need a comprehensive criticality assessment system to ensure overall resilience.
Although often mentioned together, the two concepts serve different purposes:
Criticality Assessment: identifies what is most important by analyzing how each service, asset, or process impacts operations, society, and regulatory compliance. This step focuses on impact orientation rather than causes of risk.
Risk Assessment: identifies what could threaten those critical elements — such as cyberattacks, natural disasters, or supply chain disruptions — and evaluates the likelihood, impact, and controllability.
The order matters: a business must know what is core before assessing risks. This approach optimizes resources and ensures focus on truly essential services.

Failing to identify critical elements can lead to:
Overprotection: investing in assets that are not truly essential.
Risk Blind Spots: overlooking hidden interdependencies in infrastructure or supply chains.
A structured assessment helps organizations see the relationships between systems, identify weak points that could trigger cascading effects, and build a foundation for transparent governance and data-driven decisions — valued by regulators, investors, and stakeholders alike.
Step 1 – Define What “Critical” Means
Develop a multi-dimensional definition that goes beyond financial value to include impacts on human safety, social stability, legal obligations, the environment, and supply chains.
Example: a small regional water treatment plant may impact hospitals, food factories, and power stations — turning a local issue into a cross-sector problem.
Step 2 – Categorize Levels of Criticality
Classify services and assets into three tiers:
Tier 1: disruption causes severe or cross-border consequences.
Tier 2: significant but manageable within acceptable limits.
Tier 3: localized impact, quickly recoverable.
This structure helps prioritize investments, plan contingencies, and shorten recovery times for the most critical elements.
Step 3 – Map Dependencies and Redundancies
Each essential service should trace its internal and external dependencies — such as infrastructure, energy, IT, suppliers, or cloud data. This step reveals single points of failure, where a minor incident could cripple multiple critical services.
Additionally, organizations should define the maximum allowable recovery time (RTO) to design appropriate response plans.
Step 4 – Build a “Criticality Register”
This document consolidates all critical information within the organization — including service lists, criticality tiers, dependencies, recovery times, and supporting evidence.
The register supports internal management and serves as proof of CER compliance to regulators.
The CER Directive marks a turning point in risk management thinking:
From reacting to crises → to proactively designing resilience.
From isolated risks → to systemic thinking about interconnections and dependencies.
Criticality assessment is not only a mandatory starting point of CER but also the foundation for sustainable, transparent, and adaptive governance — helping businesses maintain stability, build investor confidence, and prepare for the future of green finance and resilient infrastructure.
ARDOR Green supports Vietnamese businesses and cities in adopting international assessment frameworks and standards such as CER, helping infrastructure, services, and investments develop sustainably, flexibly, and ready for any disruption.
On 14 September 2026, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) announced that the latest versions of its complete sustainability reporting Standards are now available in Vietnamese. The release covers the revised Universal Standards, all current Sector Standards and the latest Topic Standards, including GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024, GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 and GRI 103: Energy 2025. [1] GRI first made its Standards available in Vietnamese in 2017. The 2026 update brings Vietnamese-language users up to date with the current modular system and gives companies across the country direct access to the same reporting framework used internationally to identify, manage and disclose impacts on the economy, environment and people. [1] GRI is also expanding engagement in Vietnam through training, technical guidance and knowledge-sharing, with particular attention to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). According to GRI, these programs are intended to help organizations assess sector-specific impacts, strengthen value-chain resilience and respond to disclosure expectations from international markets and sustainable finance providers. [1]
On 18 September 2026, the Vietnam International Financial Centre in Da Nang (VIFC-DN) identified green finance and the carbon market as priority areas for development. The announcement was not accompanied by a specific lending product, but it sent a clear signal about the direction of green capital in the years ahead: projects will increasingly need to demonstrate environmental performance through data that can be measured, reviewed and independently verified. For developers, industrial asset owners, FDI companies and building operators, the key question is no longer simply “Is this building green?” The more important questions are: “What data proves that it is green, who verifies that data, and will the data continue to be maintained after financing has been disbursed?”
As international investment increasingly prioritises sustainable development, green industrial parks are emerging as a new competitive benchmark for the market. The attractiveness of an industrial park is no longer determined solely by land availability or rental rates. Today, competitiveness depends increasingly on infrastructure quality, operational capability, ESG performance and the ability to create an efficient and sustainable production ecosystem for investors.
Amid increasing resource scarcity and escalating geopolitical instability, the concept of resource autonomy is emerging as a strategic priority. This article examines how resource autonomy not only complements—but may even surpass—the circular economy as a framework for enabling industrial systems to adapt to the future.
As pressure to reduce carbon emissions continues to intensify, green building materials are becoming an increasingly important direction for Vietnam’s construction industry. Green material solutions can help improve energy efficiency, reduce operating costs and minimise environmental impacts. At the same time, the use of environmentally responsible materials can support projects seeking green building certifications such as LEED, LOTUS and EDGE. For businesses, this is becoming an important factor in strengthening competitiveness and supporting long-term sustainable growth.