Share:
In the context of increasingly complex climate change and Vietnam’s commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, the development of green buildings (GBs) has been identified as one of the strategic solutions of the construction sector. Green buildings not only help reduce emissions and save energy but also create high-quality living environments, enhance competitiveness, and promote the formation of a green economy.
In the context of increasingly complex climate change and Vietnam’s commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, the development of green buildings (GBs) has been identified as one of the strategic solutions of the construction sector. Green buildings not only help reduce emissions and save energy but also create high-quality living environments, enhance competitiveness, and promote the formation of a green economy.
.jpg)
According to the Ministry of Construction, by the end of the third quarter of 2025, Vietnam had over 600 green buildings with a total floor area of nearly 17 million m². However, this growth rate still falls short of the country’s potential and practical requirements.
Mr. Luyen Van Phuong, Deputy Director of the Hanoi Department of Construction, noted that current green building policies remain mostly at an encouraging level and lack strong mandatory incentives. Implementation largely depends on the voluntary commitment of investors rather than a consistent and systemic requirement. He emphasized the need for clear roadmaps and specific targets, particularly requiring public projects such as schools and hospitals to take the lead.

From a market perspective, Mr. Nguyen Quoc Hiep, Chairman of the Vietnam Association of Construction Contractors (VACC), pointed out that most investors do not fully understand GB criteria, while contractors and builders lack information about suitable materials and processes. This indicates that the system of standards and guidelines has not yet been effectively disseminated.

In addition, implementation costs remain a significant obstacle. For example, in a 37-hectare urban project in Lang Son, the cost of upgrading from a LEED Silver to a LEED Gold certification increased by 11 billion VND, mainly due to higher technical and material requirements.
From a research perspective, Dr. Nguyen Hong Hai, Director of the Institute for Building Science and Technology, stated that incorporating green criteria into national standards means mandatory evaluation and verification from the early stages, which raises initial investment costs. Meanwhile, there is still a shortage of qualified consultants and assessors, preventing the formation of a robust green building ecosystem.

According to Ms. Do Ngoc Diep from IFC’s Green Building Program, Vietnam has “greened” an average of 4 million m² of floor area per year since 2008, across various building types — from social housing to hotels and public facilities. Therefore, the challenge lies not in technical capacity but in financial mechanisms and policy support.

Currently, Vietnam applies several international green building rating systems such as LEED, LOTUS, Green Mark, and EDGE, which assess indicators like water, energy, materials, indoor air quality, and climate adaptation. However, Ms. Luu Thi Thanh Mau (Phuc Khang Corp) emphasized that it is time for Vietnam to establish its own national GB criteria system, while also opening a “green channel” for retrofitting and upgrading approximately 40,000 existing buildings.
In response, Deputy Minister of Construction Nguyen Van Sinh affirmed that the Ministry would urgently develop and issue a national GB criteria framework, while also strengthening the training of domestic assessors and inspectors to enhance professional capacity.
In the last week of October 2025, the Ministry of Construction organized the “Vietnam Green Building and Green Transport Week 2025”, focusing on removing policy bottlenecks and promoting practical implementation across the sector.


Experts agreed that to make green buildings a mainstream trend, Vietnam must implement comprehensive actions:
Finalize mandatory standards and codes.
Expand green finance: preferential credit, tax incentives, and carbon credits.
Develop the domestic green materials market.
Train and develop specialized consulting and certification professionals.
Strengthen communication and guidance for investors and contractors.
After nearly two decades of initiation, green buildings are no longer a spontaneous option but an urgent necessity for sustainable urban development. Building a synchronized ecosystem — from policy and market to human resources — will be the key for Vietnam to realize its goals of green growth and net-zero emissions by 2050.
On 14 September 2026, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) announced that the latest versions of its complete sustainability reporting Standards are now available in Vietnamese. The release covers the revised Universal Standards, all current Sector Standards and the latest Topic Standards, including GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024, GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 and GRI 103: Energy 2025. [1] GRI first made its Standards available in Vietnamese in 2017. The 2026 update brings Vietnamese-language users up to date with the current modular system and gives companies across the country direct access to the same reporting framework used internationally to identify, manage and disclose impacts on the economy, environment and people. [1] GRI is also expanding engagement in Vietnam through training, technical guidance and knowledge-sharing, with particular attention to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). According to GRI, these programs are intended to help organizations assess sector-specific impacts, strengthen value-chain resilience and respond to disclosure expectations from international markets and sustainable finance providers. [1]
On 18 September 2026, the Vietnam International Financial Centre in Da Nang (VIFC-DN) identified green finance and the carbon market as priority areas for development. The announcement was not accompanied by a specific lending product, but it sent a clear signal about the direction of green capital in the years ahead: projects will increasingly need to demonstrate environmental performance through data that can be measured, reviewed and independently verified. For developers, industrial asset owners, FDI companies and building operators, the key question is no longer simply “Is this building green?” The more important questions are: “What data proves that it is green, who verifies that data, and will the data continue to be maintained after financing has been disbursed?”
As international investment increasingly prioritises sustainable development, green industrial parks are emerging as a new competitive benchmark for the market. The attractiveness of an industrial park is no longer determined solely by land availability or rental rates. Today, competitiveness depends increasingly on infrastructure quality, operational capability, ESG performance and the ability to create an efficient and sustainable production ecosystem for investors.
Amid increasing resource scarcity and escalating geopolitical instability, the concept of resource autonomy is emerging as a strategic priority. This article examines how resource autonomy not only complements—but may even surpass—the circular economy as a framework for enabling industrial systems to adapt to the future.
As pressure to reduce carbon emissions continues to intensify, green building materials are becoming an increasingly important direction for Vietnam’s construction industry. Green material solutions can help improve energy efficiency, reduce operating costs and minimise environmental impacts. At the same time, the use of environmentally responsible materials can support projects seeking green building certifications such as LEED, LOTUS and EDGE. For businesses, this is becoming an important factor in strengthening competitiveness and supporting long-term sustainable growth.